Subject:
|
RCX 1.5 vs 1.0 (for the record)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 25 Dec 1999 01:50:53 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ted Michon <TEDMICHON@HOMEspamcake.COM>
|
Viewed:
|
478 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Just pointing out that one visible difference between a 1.0 RCX and 1.5 RCX is
that the the 1.0 unit has a "jack" for an AC adapter while the 1.5 does not
(neither unit includes an "ac adapter" or an "ac plug", as posted here
recently). The jack can accept the plug from the ac supply supply cube used for
the current generation of 9V LEGO trains.
-Ted
Mike Kory wrote:
> Yes, you have the 1.5 version. You can tell because it doesn't have the AC
> adapter. Lego didn't mark the units "1.5", they left "1.0" on them for some
> reason.
> -Mike
>
> Daniel A. Segel <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message
> news:4.2.0.58.19991224084608.00962980@netcom8.netcom.com...
> > I just received the Lego Mindstorms RIS v1.5 as an early Christmas present,
> > but the RCX unit itself says "1.0" on it. Do all of them say this? It
> > doesn't have the AC adapter plug anywhere, and the serial number is 371372
> > so I'm pretty sure it's a brand new unit but was wondering anyway.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Daniel
> > --
> > "Ich bin ein Geleeschaumgummiring."
> > daniels@netcom.com
> >
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: RIS 1.5; question about the RCX version
|
| Yes, you have the 1.5 version. You can tell because it doesn't have the AC adapter. Lego didn't mark the units "1.5", they left "1.0" on them for some reason. -Mike Daniel A. Segel <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
16 Messages in This Thread: ![AND gate brick? -Jordan Maynard (24-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Barbara Nostrand) (24-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![RIS 1.5; question about the RCX version -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Daniel A. Segel) (24-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: RIS 1.5; question about the RCX version -Mike Kory (24-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Barbara Nostrand) (24-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -Jordan Maynard (24-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Pete Hardie) (27-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -Jacob Schultz (30-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Andy Gombos) (25-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -Tony Pugatschew (26-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -Bob Ritter (26-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![IR tower/cable -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Reede Stockton) (27-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: IR tower/cable -Dave Baum (27-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Barbara Nostrand) (30-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: AND gate brick? -lego-robotics@crynwr.com (Andy Gombos) (25-Dec-99 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|