Subject:
|
Re: AND gate brick?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 14:09:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
996 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi,
What about LEGO AND-OR matrices, like in PALs. We could use one stub to
indicate each wire crossing, and use metallic 1x1 plates to "burn"
contacts. The plates would be rather large though... and the electronics
complicated... :-(
Just a thought
Jacob
JDM wrote:
> Additionally, if you had bricks for all these types of functions, you could
> build logic systems with the bricks directly from schematics or circut
> diagrams...
>
> Imagine being able to say something like, "signal the RCX if touch sensor 1
> and 2 are touched together, *or* if light sensor 1 is not on" ...
>
> The benefit to being able to do this is that it is all done in "brickware" and
> all sitting on only ***ONE*** RCX sensor input!!!
>
> You would need one AND brick, one OR brick and one NOT brick (a NOT brick
> might be hard to do, would it need it's own power supply?)
>
> This would be a great help in conserving RCX inputs...
>
> JDM
--
/* Our e-mail addresses have changed. anne.jacob@get2net is only for
messages which are ment for both of us. Anne's mail should be sent to
eowyn@get2net.dk and mine to dungeonmaster@get2net.dk (prefered) or
c948605@student.dtu.dk. *** Geek by nature - Linux by choice ***/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: AND gate brick?
|
| (...) Additionally, if you had bricks for all these types of functions, you could build logic systems with the bricks directly from schematics or circut diagrams... Imagine being able to say something like, "signal the RCX if touch sensor 1 and 2 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
