Subject:
|
Re: AND gate brick?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 27 Dec 1999 15:43:01 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Pete Hardie <PETE.HARDIE@DVSG.SCIATLspamcake.COM>
|
Viewed:
|
710 times
|
| |
|
|
JDM wrote:
> Imagine being able to say something like, "signal the RCX if touch sensor 1
> and 2 are touched together, *or* if light sensor 1 is not on" ...
>
> The benefit to being able to do this is that it is all done in "brickware" and
> all sitting on only ***ONE*** RCX sensor input!!!
>
> You would need one AND brick, one OR brick and one NOT brick (a NOT brick
> might be hard to do, would it need it's own power supply?)
There was a Scientific American article about 'photovores' that had simple
(virtual) robots governed by basic logic circuits and motors. It was published
circa 1986-7, and was really cool w/r/t the behaviours that arose out of
really trivial logic driving motors.
--
Pete Hardie | Goalie, DVSG Dart Team
Scientific Atlanta |
Digital Video Services Group |
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: AND gate brick?
|
| (...) Additionally, if you had bricks for all these types of functions, you could build logic systems with the bricks directly from schematics or circut diagrams... Imagine being able to say something like, "signal the RCX if touch sensor 1 and 2 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
