 | | Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) That's correct. The lego-robotics@crynwr.com list is gatewayed with lugnet.robotics only and does not receive messages posted to any of its subgroups. (...) Well, in that case, I've got Killer News for ya! :) Not only is it feasible, but it's (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | Todd, Now that everyone has been properly schooled of the ins and outs of receiving some or all robotics posts (thank you for teaching everyone), can I have my robotics.sensors? *down on floor begging* (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I would think the support of Michael Gasperi and Brian Stormont would be important here, since this would be moving a certain amount of traffic down to a lower level rather than creating new traffic from scratch (where there is no loss but (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Pink Tail
|
| | | | I still can't quite understand why it is so important to get sensors out of the standard listing. Aren't robots 33% sensors and 33% actuators and 33% software (rounded to the nearest 33%)? Confused ... JB ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) I don't either, unless the subject of sensors is currently suffering from not having its own group/list, which I don't think it is. I just responded to Rob trying to be objective. He doesn't have my support in creating a new group for sensors (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Andy Gombos
|
| | | | I also fail to see why a seperate group is needed. If a seperate group is made, then all the people from this list that do not suscribe to the subgroup cannot participate in dicussions, unless they go to the website, or use a news reader. This could (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Nope, that statement as a whole is not correct. It's partially correct in that people who subscribe only to the lego-robotics@crynwr.com mailing list would indeed not automatically see a new sensors subgroup of lugnet.robotics, but it's not (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | [I'm replying to an email that Stuart Crenshaw wrote. He said it was OK to quote him here and reply for everyone's benefit. I quoted his reply inline below to fit into the thread.] (...) No, you actually can post to lugnet newsgroups via e-mail (not (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
