 | | Re: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu) —Michael Gasperi
|
| | | Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:FMt33p.15s@lugnet.com... (...) benefit (...) which (...) sensor (...) this? I'm not sure what a uber-guru is. Heck I don't even know how you got the dot things above the u. I'd rather the sensor (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | (...) Well, assume that lugnet.robotics is a file folder. All subfolders are still "in" that folder. i.e. all posts to, say, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc still get posted to lugnet.robotics. So if you actually GO to lugnet.com and read the .robotic (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu) —Jasper Janssen
|
| | | | | (...) But that's _not_ how it works. Jasper (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | (...) Then why did I find this message on the main lugnet.robotic page? (URL) saw it @ 8:53 a.m. Rob (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, that depends on your newsreader, actually. Rob is indeed correct about what he thought he saw. :) Most newsreaders don't have a feature to coalesce groups in a hierarchy into a single virtual group, but the LUGNET web interface is magic (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) That's correct. The lego-robotics@crynwr.com list is gatewayed with lugnet.robotics only and does not receive messages posted to any of its subgroups. (...) Well, in that case, I've got Killer News for ya! :) Not only is it feasible, but it's (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | | Todd, Now that everyone has been properly schooled of the ins and outs of receiving some or all robotics posts (thank you for teaching everyone), can I have my robotics.sensors? *down on floor begging* (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I would think the support of Michael Gasperi and Brian Stormont would be important here, since this would be moving a certain amount of traffic down to a lower level rather than creating new traffic from scratch (where there is no loss but (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Pink Tail
|
| | | | | | I still can't quite understand why it is so important to get sensors out of the standard listing. Aren't robots 33% sensors and 33% actuators and 33% software (rounded to the nearest 33%)? Confused ... JB ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) I don't either, unless the subject of sensors is currently suffering from not having its own group/list, which I don't think it is. I just responded to Rob trying to be objective. He doesn't have my support in creating a new group for sensors (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Andy Gombos
|
| | | | | | I also fail to see why a seperate group is needed. If a seperate group is made, then all the people from this list that do not suscribe to the subgroup cannot participate in dicussions, unless they go to the website, or use a news reader. This could (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) Nope, that statement as a whole is not correct. It's partially correct in that people who subscribe only to the lego-robotics@crynwr.com mailing list would indeed not automatically see a new sensors subgroup of lugnet.robotics, but it's not (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors) — Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | [I'm replying to an email that Stuart Crenshaw wrote. He said it was OK to quote him here and reply for everyone's benefit. I quoted his reply inline below to fit into the thread.] (...) No, you actually can post to lugnet newsgroups via e-mail (not (...) (25 years ago, 21-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: sensors (was: Re: New newsgroup lugnet.loc.eu) —Marco C.
|
| | | | (...) and (...) And so I thought. hendrix took me by surprise there... That's why I'm going to subscribe to most of lugnet.robotics.* and putting all the incoming msgs into a lugnet-robotics mailboxfolder sorted by subject. I'll do the reply to the (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
