Subject:
|
Re: tracking robot position
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 13 Nov 1999 01:01:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1075 times
|
| |
|
|
This isn't suitable for Vlad's original problem, but I do want to point out
that motors can be adapted as cheap rotation sensors (actually rotational
velocity sensors, which is the first deriviative of what a normal rotation
sensor gives you) by connecting them through a couple resistors to a sensor
input. You can even use the same motor as a motor output, although it defeats
the input's ability to measure rotation. See
http://www.mrob.com/robot/adapter.html and see www.mrob.com/robot for a
description of what I used this for.
- Robert Munafo www.mrob.com
In lugnet.robotics, Philippe Jadin writes:
> [...] did anyone build a reliable (and cheaper) rotation sensor
> replacement? [...]
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: tracking robot position
|
| Using two rotation sensors should do the job nicely, at a higher cost however. But you can connect them directly to the RCX. About that : did anyone build a reliable (and cheaper) rotation sensor replacement? Why not using a lego wheel with holes (...) (25 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
