Subject:
|
Re: Could somebody use this program?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Oct 1999 03:01:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
821 times
|
| |
|
|
Luis,
The main problem is that I'm using the gnuwin32 environment instead of the
cygwin (and I have lot of programs made with gnuwin32 so it's not wise
either to port them to cygwin rather set up a secondary c/c++ environment).
I was quite surprised that there were some oddities in the make files to
build up the binutils. Next I found that there were in website
<http://www.beesknees.freeserve.co.uk/lego/> instruction to use only the
cygwin one.
What is the reason to just depend on the cygwin environment? It's is very
important to code the nonGUI programs such a way that it can be compiled any
major operating system. (Some of my programs are used in and compiled to
Linux, Sun, HP, Win95/98 and NT without any modifications to the source
code). I would have challenged my self to dig in more deeper to this oddity,
but so far the spirit.ocx and NQC have been enough for my projects.
--
et
Luis Villa <liv@duke.edu> wrote in message
news:Pine.SOL.3.91.991005110934.9000A-100000@teer13.acpub.duke.edu...
> legOS runs fine under the cygwin environment in NT- I finally even tried
> it myself :) Was there a specific problem that you were having in the
> porting? The cygnus install is not straightforward- I'll be the first to
> admit that- but if you are familiar with UNIX, or have used cygnus in the
> past, the rest should be pretty straightforward. If you want to try
> again, let me or the LegOS list know- we should be able to figure it out
> with you.
> -Luis
>
> On Tue, 5 Oct 1999, Ensio Tammi wrote:
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > You can program the RCX and CyberMaster with quite many languages (such • as
> > Visual J++, Visual C++, Visual Basic) using the spirit.ocx. Also the RCX
> > ControlCenter with NQC is pretty good. (The legOS would be the ultimate
> > thing, but it's more Linux oriented than acceptable. I have programmed • years
> > with the gnu's c/c++ excellent environment in NT, but found that it's • too
> > time consuming to port legOS to NT :-().
> >
> > What would be your program's main benefits compared to the ones • mentioned
> > above?
> >
> > --
> > et
> >
> > Michael Lachmann <m.lachmann@xpoint.at> wrote in message
> > news:FJ43sC.72D@lugnet.com...
> > > Hy I'm the author of MLCad and I'm dreaming a bit now. My idea was to • write
> > > a program which is able to program the CyberMaster and the RCX brick.
> > > To construct the program I though I might use something like building • blocks
> > > one for each possible operation, statement... (generally similar to • Lego's
> > > Invention System Software).
> > > But it would be able to load the program to a CyberMaster brick as • well
> > and
> > > maybe the program is a little bit more handy than Lego's software.
> > >
> > > I would not start with this program, if you think its waisted time ... • or
> > > please report ... if you saw a program like that somewhere else. Don't • mix
> > > it up with other firmware projects for the RCX since this doesn't work • with
> > > the CyberMaster!!!!
> > >
> > > Please post comments to this group or send them via e-mail
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Mike
> > >
> > > e-mail: m.lachmann@xpoint.at
> > > Url: http://www.user.xpoint.at/m.lachmann/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
> #######################################################################
>
> Profanity is the one language that all programmers understand.
> -Anonymous
>
> #######################################################################
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Could somebody use this program?
|
| legOS runs fine under the cygwin environment in NT- I finally even tried it myself :) Was there a specific problem that you were having in the porting? The cygnus install is not straightforward- I'll be the first to admit that- but if you are (...) (25 years ago, 5-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
