Subject:
|
Re: output A in reverse weak and NQC question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 1 Aug 1999 16:14:14 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Tim Gion <tcg3j@csSTOPSPAM.virginia.edu>
|
Viewed:
|
1140 times
|
| |
|
|
I did some more experimenting today and it turns out that output A is weak
in reverse, normal in forward and output B behaves in the opposite manner.
It looks like output C is the only one that performs fine in both
directions. Has any one else run into this?
Tim
Tim Gion
tcg3j@cs.virginia.edu (fastest) or gion@cs.virginia.edu
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~tcg3j
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: output A in reverse weak and NQC question
|
| It may not even be an RCX problem. I've found that all my Lego motors run better in one direction than the other. Has got to do with the magnetisation of the pole pieces, I believe. Try checking out by connecting the motors directly to the Lego 9V (...) (25 years ago, 2-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: output A in reverse weak and NQC question
|
| In article (...) I can take a look at the problem if you try downloading the program in verbose mode by using the -v option... nqc -v -d foo.nqc and send me (dbaum@enteract.com) the output. That should at least tell me where the communication is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
