Subject:
|
Re: output A in reverse weak and NQC question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sun, 1 Aug 1999 05:24:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1151 times
|
| |
|
|
In article
<Pine.GSO.4.05.9907312225570.4645-100000@cobra.cs.Virginia.EDU>, Tim Gion
<tcg3j@cs.virginia.edu> wrote:
> I'm also having problems downloading programs using NQC. For some reason,
> trying to download the following gives me an IR error:
>
> task main
> {
> Rev(OUT_A | OUT_C, OUT_FULL);
> }
>
> However, if I add PlaySound(0); after the reverse command, it downloads
> fine. Any ideas?
I can take a look at the problem if you try downloading the program in
verbose mode by using the -v option...
nqc -v -d foo.nqc
and send me (dbaum@enteract.com) the output. That should at least tell me
where the communication is failing. While you're at it, download the
working version as well and send me the output. It would be interesting
to compare why adding the extra command fixes the problem.
Dave Baum
--
reply to: dbaum at enteract dot com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: output A in reverse weak and NQC question
|
| I did some more experimenting today and it turns out that output A is weak in reverse, normal in forward and output B behaves in the opposite manner. It looks like output C is the only one that performs fine in both directions. Has any one else run (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | output A in reverse weak and NQC question
|
| I just picked up Mindstorms on Thursday. Today, I noticed that output A in reverse is significantly weaker running a motor than it is running the motor forward. I've tried this with more than one motor and also compared it to that of output C. Is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
