Subject:
|
Re: interest in JVM porting effort
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 May 1999 21:37:06 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
John A. Tamplin <jat@STOPSPAMMERSliveonthenet.com>
|
Viewed:
|
1390 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 7 May 1999, Eric Lind wrote:
> I was merely ruminating on packages that might provide interesting
> interfaces/classes, and packages that we can toss out of hand. I wasn't trying
> to imply (although my post did seem that way) that we should implement ALL of
> java.io, just that parts of it could be useful. It could be nice to have the
> RCX specific classes implement the existing i/o interfaces to provide a uniform
> access from an external development system. The actual RCX-internals could
> care less about streams, but the higher level classes a programmer would use
> probably should (if only superficially).
>
> I'm somewhat hampered by a lack of knowledge about the inner workings of the
> RCX (a situation I'm working to rectify), so I'm focusing more on the classes a
> programmer would use in development later on, rather than the actual JVM.
Ok, that sounds reasonable.
John A. Tamplin Traveller Information Services
jat@LiveOnTheNet.COM 2104 West Ferry Way
256/705-7007 - FAX 256/705-7100 Huntsville, AL 35801
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: interest in JVM porting effort
|
| I was merely ruminating on packages that might provide interesting interfaces/classes, and packages that we can toss out of hand. I wasn't trying to imply (although my post did seem that way) that we should implement ALL of java.io, just that parts (...) (25 years ago, 7-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
