Subject:
|
Re: interest in JVM porting effort
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 May 1999 12:49:41 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Patrick M Young <patrick@patrick.demon.%NoMoreSpam%co.uk>
|
Viewed:
|
1051 times
|
| |
|
|
In message <Pine.A32.3.91.990506012844.41644A-100000@cyclone.liveonthene
t.com>, John A. Tamplin <jat@liveonthenet.com> writes
> I remain convinced that implementing a Java virtual machine subset is the
> best approach
>
>
> I am aware that some of you think this project is foolhardy. You are
> welcome to your opinion -- the beauty of an open system is that everyone
> can build their favorite tools on top of it.
Good for you! If you have an achievable goal then get cracking. I would
offer help but my HelloWorld applet skills are not really the ticket.
However, if I was clever enough I would do it - in Java.
:-)
Best wishes,
Pad
--
Patrick M Young
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | interest in JVM porting effort
|
| I realize there is still ongoing discussion about the "next generation" OS for the RCX, but it appears there are two immovable camps. One camp wants to do the minimum work possible and come up with an incremental upgrade to the existing firmware. (...) (26 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
