Subject:
|
Re: multi-device output controller
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Mar 1999 19:08:54 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1090 times
|
| |
|
|
Lou Sortman wrote:
> Wes Matchett wrote:
>
> > There are 8 levels of PWM, so fwd/rev for 4 devices is possible.
>
> Are you sure? I wasn't, so I went looking. The NQC docs seem to imply 7 powers levels
> plus off. Which, technically, is 8 levels of PWM, but if you use all of them, a motor is
> running at all times. That is fine if you use another motor output to control the speed
> (as you mention later), but not if an external battery box is being used. The application
> where it is ok to have a motor running at all times will be rare. You could simply not use
> channel 0, but why build it then?
I don't know how NQC drives the ports, but both rcxcc and the RIS software have separate
controls for on/off and power level. I just tested setting all 8 power settings - motors
operates for all 8.
-Wes
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: multi-device output controller
|
| Thanks for checking this out. This is important to know. I assume, then, that the duty cycles are 1/8 through 8/8 as well as off, which would be 0/8. Can anybody verify this (with a scope or something)? I have long wondered whether the duty cycles (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: multi-device output controller
|
| (...) Are you sure? I wasn't, so I went looking. The NQC docs seem to imply 7 powers levels plus off. Which, technically, is 8 levels of PWM, but if you use all of them, a motor is running at all times. That is fine if you use another motor output (...) (26 years ago, 26-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
