Subject:
|
Re: IR camera?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Feb 1999 04:45:28 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Ron Beck <(rtb@richmond.infi.net)antispam()>
|
Reply-To:
|
RTB@RICHMONDnomorespam.INFI.NET
|
Viewed:
|
1508 times
|
| |
|
|
> > I'm not an AI expert, so correct me if I'm wrong.
>
> You're wrong :->
>
> > To evolve, you need a purpose and some means to give it a score how it performs in real life.
> > It would evolve into what? It needs a purpose. And why should it evolve in the first place?
> > How would you say that "no, this design is no good". Grab the best of this design and try to combine
> > it with the best of previous designs, adding some random data (I believe this is called Genetic Algorithms).
> > And so on, and so on...
>
> All that is needed for evolution is variation and selection. Variation
> with in the 'genes' of
> the population would be the instructions to build each. Selection would
> be some method that
> would mark the 'unfit', so that they would not reproduce, or at least
> less well.
>
> Frex, let's say you have your factory, and each legobot carries its
> building instructions, and each
> is programmed to run a maze. You have the factory at the end, and it
> closes its doors after
> 10 legobots have entered. You will get fast maze running robots from
> this.
Aren't the religious discussions on this list supposed to be confined to
the
ten commandments of LEGO?
--
Did you check the web site first?: http://www.crynwr.com/lego-robotics
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: IR camera?
|
| (...) You're wrong :-> (...) All that is needed for evolution is variation and selection. Variation with in the 'genes' of the population would be the instructions to build each. Selection would be some method that would mark the 'unfit', so that (...) (26 years ago, 12-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
