Subject:
|
Re: Mindstorms (more than just robotics?)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 7 Nov 1998 19:00:37 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Peter Hesketh <PBH@PHESK.DEMONihatespam.CO.UK>
|
Viewed:
|
2686 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <RP0jfKAw2BR2Ew7K@gseel.demon.co.uk>, Geoff Seel
<geoffs@gseel.demon.co.uk> writes
> I personally like the programming, but, there is a MISTAKE! The MISTAKE
> is, when it has a "stack" it does this: When it starts a new stack, it
> does not carry on with the old one.
Is that while building the stacks on screen, or when executing them in
the 'bot? In other words, are you saying the 'bot won't multitask?
--
Regards - Peter Hesketh, Mynyddbach, Mon.
Real men don't use Frames.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Mindstorms (more than just robotics?)
|
| Several replies in one go to avoid multiple messages In message <jCKx2LBVjJR2EwcJ@ph...on.co.uk>, Peter Hesketh <pbh@phesk.demon.co.uk> writes (...) It appears that if a sensor gets reactivated before its stack has completed the current execution of (...) (26 years ago, 8-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Mindstorms (more than just robotics?)
|
| In message <199811062316.PAA085...ford.EDU>, Kekoa Proudfoot <kekoa@Graphics.Stanford.EDU> writes (...) Feedback from a 10-year old (entirely his own words including e-mail shouting!) ---...--- I personally like the programming, but, there is a (...) (26 years ago, 7-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
