Subject:
|
Re: another comparison
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 22:52:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4476 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Juergen Stuber wrote:
> Hi Claude,
>
> "Claude Baumann" <cbaumann@ci.educ.lu> writes:
> > In lugnet.robotics, Juergen Stuber wrote:
> > >
> > > do you have the DFT algorithm in some programming language like Java or C?
> >
> > The document, where I develop the theory of the algorithm
> > has some text-pseudo code ( a mixture of C and PASCAL)
> > that you easily can convert to anything.
>
> thanks, I found it at http://www.ultimaterobolab.com/pdfs/5_RFT.pdf .
>
> And pseudocode is fine with me, Java or C were just meant as examples
> for textual languages.
>
> > Since the document is math stuff, I largely prefer the :=
> > notation for assignment.
>
> :-)
>
> Best is to avoid assignment and modifiable state whenever possible.
>
>
> Jürgen
1. Indeed.
2. I got an email some time ago from a 16 year old student Korean student, Jimin
Sung,living in the US, who is making an autonomous underwater robot. I was so
amazed of what he was doing. He sent me his application of the RFT algorithm to
fsk-modulation detection. Though incomplete, I posted it to
http://www.convict.lu/Jeunes/ultimate_stuff/mfsk.pdf. If a gifted 16 year-old
boy can use it, any adult Mindstormer should be able to use it.
Claude
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: another comparison
|
| Hi Claude, (...) thanks, I found it at (URL) . And pseudocode is fine with me, Java or C were just meant as examples for textual languages. (...) :-) Best is to avoid assignment and modifiable state whenever possible. Jürgen (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
