Subject:
|
Re: another comparison
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:25:52 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Juergen Stuber <juergen@jstuber.NOSPAMnet>
|
Viewed:
|
3369 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Claude,
"Claude Baumann" <cbaumann@ci.educ.lu> writes:
>
> We have compared the sampling and computing speed of NXT
> and RCX. NXT uses standard firmware 1.03 and is programmed
> with the LabVIEW toolkit. RCX is programmed with ULTIMATE
> ROBOLAB. Both bricks do the same thing: computing the DFT
> on a small dataset of 128 points that are read from the
> legacy light-sensor on a shaft encoder that is rotated
> with a legacy motor.
do you have the DFT algorithm in some programming language like Java or C?
I'm just guessing, but maybe it could also be useful for speech recognition?
Or maybe telling the cat from the dog?
(The sound sensor should be usable as a microphone.)
Cheers
Jürgen
--
Jürgen Stuber <juergen@jstuber.net>
http://www.jstuber.net/
gnupg key fingerprint = 2767 CA3C 5680 58BA 9A91 23D9 BED6 9A7A AF9E 68B4
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: another comparison
|
| (...) Hi Jürgen, The document, where I develop the theory of the algorithm has some text-pseudo code ( a mixture of C and PASCAL) that you easily can convert to anything. Since the document is math stuff, I largely prefer the := notation for (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | another comparison
|
| We have compared the sampling and computing speed of NXT and RCX. NXT uses standard firmware 1.03 and is programmed with the LabVIEW toolkit. RCX is programmed with ULTIMATE ROBOLAB. Both bricks do the same thing: computing the DFT on a small (...) (18 years ago, 20-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
