Subject:
|
Re: another comparison
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:32:10 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Juergen Stuber <{juergen@jstuber}spamless{.net}>
|
Viewed:
|
3357 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi Claude,
"Claude Baumann" <cbaumann@ci.educ.lu> writes:
> In lugnet.robotics, Juergen Stuber wrote:
> >
> > do you have the DFT algorithm in some programming language like Java or C?
>
> The document, where I develop the theory of the algorithm
> has some text-pseudo code ( a mixture of C and PASCAL)
> that you easily can convert to anything.
thanks, I found it at http://www.ultimaterobolab.com/pdfs/5_RFT.pdf .
And pseudocode is fine with me, Java or C were just meant as examples
for textual languages.
> Since the document is math stuff, I largely prefer the :=
> notation for assignment.
:-)
Best is to avoid assignment and modifiable state whenever possible.
Jürgen
--
Jürgen Stuber <juergen@jstuber.net>
http://www.jstuber.net/
gnupg key fingerprint = 2767 CA3C 5680 58BA 9A91 23D9 BED6 9A7A AF9E 68B4
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: another comparison
|
| (...) 1. Indeed. 2. I got an email some time ago from a 16 year old student Korean student, Jimin Sung,living in the US, who is making an autonomous underwater robot. I was so amazed of what he was doing. He sent me his application of the RFT (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: another comparison
|
| (...) Hi Jürgen, The document, where I develop the theory of the algorithm has some text-pseudo code ( a mixture of C and PASCAL) that you easily can convert to anything. Since the document is math stuff, I largely prefer the := notation for (...) (17 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
