 | | Re: SDK for NXT
|
|
(...) I believe that folks at National Instruments are working on writing a document that describes the .rxe file format and the byte codes supported by the official NXT firmware's virtual machine. If I understand it correctly, the VM in the NXT (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | SDK for NXT
|
|
Has a SDK describing the structure of the NXT bytes codes been released, or has there been any mention from Lego as to when it will be released. I assume that the MDP have seen something, is it released or still under NDA? Chris (19 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | BASIC for the NXT was Re: R21 - Robot Status
|
|
Rob Antonishen wrote: > > P.S. Anyone coming with an NXT "demonstration" t-o-w bot, since they > are not allowed to compete? > I ~would~ BUT......I !HATE! the GUI programing software. (Yes I know it was designed for kids, and I understand that I am (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT powered by USB?
|
|
(...) Indeed, a single motor at full load draws more current (about 800mA at 9V) than USB could supply (500mA at 5V). What might have been possible (but probably involving a lot of added complexity in power supply design for a limited advantage) (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT powered by USB?
|
|
(...) no, it doesn't. The motors would require much more power than you can draw from there. Steve (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | NXT powered by USB?
|
|
Does anyone know whether the NXT brick can use USB-supplied power rather than its own batteries while connected? It'd be nice during experimenting and hacking, but I'd guess it doesn't... (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
|
(...) If I understand what you mean, yes, you can make an arrangement of modules that satisfys the GBC spec input/output as a whol, even though they don't individually. That's fine (like Rafe's "supermodule", for instance). But then the individual (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: thoughts on gbc module reliability
|
|
John Brost writes: > The idea of the spec was so that EVERY module could be put ANYWHERE > in the GBC and it would all work. In the past, this has been bent > so that modules that can't handle large batches are not placed > downstream of a batch- (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
(...) I'm not certain, but I think the file size will be basically the same for each resample option since the result is an 8k 8 bit mono file. There may be slight differences. The higher quality options (in quality order from top to bottom) may be (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Memory - Where did it go?
|
|
Wow, what a wealth of information. Thanks for the great detail. I am already using the Wav2Rso program but did not know enough about sound files to understand the convertion options. Which option gives you the smallest converted file? In your other (...) (19 years ago, 10-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
