 | | Re: Game Boy + LEGO = Robot
|
|
(...) Hi Philo, Yes they are, give or take, the same. However, the Charmed Labs ones have Lego axle holes! Danny (URL) (19 years ago, 28-May-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Game Boy + LEGO = Robot
|
|
(...) Have also a look to these: (URL) (same wheels?) shawn to me by Bernard Catt. Philo (19 years ago, 28-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with RCX
|
|
(...) I agree - and furthermore, whilst a dead short might well cause a battery leak (when the batteries get hot, the contents can expand and rupture the cell) - it's kinda unusual for a battery leak to cause a dead short - the corrosive gunk inside (...) (19 years ago, 28-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Problem with RCX
|
|
(...) The dead short could have caused the batteries to leak. That's probably the only way to get batteries to leak in only a week. (19 years ago, 28-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Game Boy + LEGO = Robot
|
|
(...) Ahh, between the two articles; yours and the one on Charmed Labs, I learned a lot about this technology. THANK YOU e p.s. yes those Omni Wheels are very cool! (19 years ago, 27-May-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Game Boy + LEGO = Robot
|
|
(...) Eric, I came across this some time ago, and even thought about seriously as a controller, although quids in its a bit pricy to buy the device and a GBA if you havent already got one just to use this. I have just dusted off a page I have on it (...) (19 years ago, 27-May-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Game Boy + LEGO = Robot
|
|
A friend pointed this out to me. (URL) e (19 years ago, 27-May-06, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Problem with RCX
|
|
I have a 2.0 RCX that is only about 6 months old. I had just put a new set of batteries in it the other day and it was working fine. I had not used it for about a week and then tried it out and it was completely dead. I opened up the battery box and (...) (19 years ago, 26-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NXT Line Follower
|
|
(...) Good question. I never tried it that way... and now the bot is in pieces for my next idea... (19 years ago, 26-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | RE: NXT Line Follower
|
|
Just wondering whether the same (unmodified) program will also work when you set the robot to follow in the opposite direction. It appears that you're following the outer edge of the line and I was wondering about the performance when following the (...) (19 years ago, 26-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | NXT Line Follower
|
|
All, I have posted pics and video of my NXT Line Follower. (URL) (19 years ago, 26-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
Hello John, (...) I have played with this command, it seems that only the low nibble of paramater is useful. The interval range goes from 12.5ms for 0 to 3s for 0xf. Interval seems to be roughly proportional to the square of the parameter. I have (...) (19 years ago, 24-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) Excellent! Thanks for the update, and it's great to know this is availible within the HW. I wish NXT-G had access, but... well, either it eventually will, or LEGO has specificly included goodies in the FW just for 3rd party environments. (...) (19 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) I can confirm that the 0x2, 0x41, 0x0 "off" command does, indeed, turn off the clicking sound that you can hear coming from the US sensor. I can also confirm that the 0x2, 0x40, 0xNN "set measurement interval" command does set the measurement (...) (19 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) ; us_off.nbc ; ---...--- variable declarations ---...--- dseg segment ;------- definitions ------- TCommLSWrite struct Result sbyte Port byte Buffer byte[] ReturnLen byte TCommLSWrite ends ;------- declarations ------- thePort byte 0 // port 1 (...) (19 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) OK, verification done, the voltage is correctly switched to 5V with the touch sensor. I probably programmed a wrong port# ! But clearly the 5V is enough to power the US transducers (probably with reduced range) Philo (19 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) OK, and since I'm one of the few... I sent up a stationary NXT with an US sensor, and a "target" NXT with an US sensor as well, pointed directly at each other. Furthermore I had the "target" move back and forth to vary the range slightly. I (...) (19 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) I'm not sure yet; I admit to not being even remotely a "hardware guy", which is why I keep doing all this SW testing :-). (...) Another odd feature is that the ping frequency seems to change with both what you define the sensor as well as (...) (19 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) Sorry Brian, you are right! my ageing ear was not able to get the much weaker "ping" at first. My interpretation (to be confimed) is that the US sensor goes on working even if not configured, but some sensor modes don't provide the 9V supply (...) (19 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensor interactions
|
|
(...) Agreed... perhaps surprisingly, based on dozens of hours of testing, with 1) sumo bots with a ring of sonars on all sides 2) Lego bots with two sonars on the front, we found no discernable problem. This is an anecdotal report, but the (...) (19 years ago, 22-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
