Subject:
|
Re: NXT Sound Sensor
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 May 2006 05:47:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2827 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
> But I think turning the CPU into a
> DSP would rule out all the other processing which needs to take place to perform
> as a NXT handling bluetooth, USB, 4 channels of bit banged I2C, motor loop
> control etc at the same time. There are only so many CPU cycles available in
> every second :)
I agree about high grade DSP, but frequency discrimination may be quite
possible... in the past we had a product based on a puny 8MHz 80C188 that was
able to run ISDN stack, transfer 64 kbits/s data on one channel, 64 kbits/s
voice on the other AND perform DTMF decoding at the same time.
Philo
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: NXT Sound Sensor
|
| (...) There is a curious 6th wire connection from the sound sensor which sends analog sound to the CPU. I am assuming that using some 3rd party firmware, it might be possible to digitize and process sound data. But I think turning the CPU into a DSP (...) (18 years ago, 6-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread: ![NXT Sound Sensor -Tim Byrne (5-May-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: NXT Sound Sensor -Brian Davis (5-May-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: NXT Sound Sensor -Ross Crawford (5-May-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: NXT Sound Sensor -Brian Davis (5-May-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: NXT Sound Sensor -John Barnes (6-May-06 to lugnet.robotics)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|