Subject:
|
Re: self-propagating RCX program
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 10 Sep 2005 10:17:43 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1157 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Claude Baumann wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, orionrobots@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > On 09/09/05, Steve Hassenplug <Steve@teamhassenplug.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, September 9, 2005 1:07 pm, danny staple wrote:
> > > > On 09/09/05, Steve Hassenplug <Steve@teamhassenplug.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > However, I think making a self-replicating robot from LEGO is not
> > > > > realistic.
> > > >
> > > > I think efforts to build a Lego Robot that builds simple Lego models
> > > > have been made, and sucessfully, but only for fairly simple assemblies
> > > > ( a 4 peice Lego "Duck").
> > >
> > > You're right. If it's possible to design a robot that can build a four piece
> > > duck,
> > > it must be possible to design a robot that can build a robot that can build
> > > other
> > > robots. How many parts can these robots have anyway? Maybe a couple hundred.
> > > That's only fifty times as many as a duck.
> > >
> > > Still, I think I'll stand by my claim that making a self-replicating robot
> > > from LEGO
> > > is not realistic.
> > >
> > > Steve
> >
> > I agree with you that it is probably not realistic, but that wont stop
> > me having fun trying.
> >
> > I would like to build a robot that can build stuff, though I will
> > probably not use the RCX to control it - something with many more
> > outputs and sensors would be required. Still - we already build Lego
> > tools for stuff like pushing out pins and such - so although it is far
> > away, it is along a path people have already started down.
> >
> > I get the feeling though that building a robot to assemble using Lego
> > peices is easier than one to mould or assemble non-Lego.
> >
> > OrionRobots
>
> I'm more optimistic. This is extremely challenging. We should really start with
> an assemling robot. There are experiences to gain first. Hope there are some of
> the mechanical gurus that help think about it. What about you guys Ferrari? Or
> Philo?
>
> -Claude
The first step is to make a decent robot hand for manipulating bricks. that's
not a humanoid hand, but one that handles Lego pieces well, yet is quite simple.
The hand on my Pick and Place Robot is OK for handling 2xn bricks:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?f=82738
I was thinking along the lines of an assembly robot for my next pneumatic robot,
now that I have an arsenal of logic gates to fulfil its functions.
Mark
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: self-propagating RCX program
|
| (...) I'm more optimistic. This is extremely challenging. We should really start with an assemling robot. There are experiences to gain first. Hope there are some of the mechanical gurus that help think about it. What about you guys Ferrari? Or (...) (19 years ago, 10-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
