Subject:
|
Re: why doesn't this work?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 00:52:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1100 times
|
| |
|
|
> Your exactly right, the results are a sequence 1-20, meaning that it takes 20
> sensor changes to go from full speed to stop. The rest of the array is zero's as
> it should be, so the program works perfectly.
That doesn't totally seem right. I would think it would slow, before stoping.
One last thing to try is actually storing sensor value in the array.
Also, in the Checkvar function, it looks like the line:
if(temp<27) temp=0;
should say
if(temp>=27) temp=0;
is that right?
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | That doesn't totally seem right.
|
| (...) That occured to me after my last posting, but I can't think why it wouldn't slow. (...) Yes, your right. I've switched to the 10x Swan firmware, and stored the results in the datalog. Here they are Variable 4: 4 Variable 4: 0 Variable 4: 3 (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: why doesn't this work?
|
| (...) Your exactly right, the results are a sequence 1-20, meaning that it takes 20 sensor changes to go from full speed to stop. The rest of the array is zero's as it should be, so the program works perfectly. I'm amazed though that the rotation (...) (20 years ago, 30-Nov-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
