To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 23093
23092  |  23094
Subject: 
Re: That doesn't totally seem right.
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 18:33:08 GMT
Viewed: 
1418 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, Steve Hassenplug wrote:

If you're storing this all in the datalog, you should be able to go much farther
than 27 times through the loop.  Try storing a couple hundred values  (how big is
the datalog?)


The datalog was 27 but is now 100 (I was pushed for time earlier).


Then, you should see the time-between-changes get bigger.

That's exactly what happens now.


Also, it seems odd that almost every other value is zero.  I'm sure that has
something to do with the timing of everything.  I suspect the sensor value is not
updated every time it goes throught the loop.

I can now see that the zero's fade over time.

Here's the latest results.

Variable 4: 1
Variable 4: 5
Variable 4: 0
Variable 4: 4
Variable 4: 1
Variable 4: 6
Variable 4: 1
Variable 4: 4
Variable 4: 0
Variable 4: 7
Variable 4: 1
Variable 4: 5
Variable 4: 0
Variable 4: 7
Variable 4: 2
Variable 4: 5
Variable 4: 2
Variable 4: 7
Variable 4: 0
Variable 4: 6
Variable 4: 0
Variable 4: 9
Variable 4: 2
Variable 4: 7
Variable 4: 0
Variable 4: 9
Variable 4: 3
Variable 4: 6
Variable 4: 1
Variable 4: 10
Variable 4: 2
Variable 4: 9
Variable 4: 2
Variable 4: 14
Variable 4: 2
Variable 4: 8
Variable 4: 7
Variable 4: 15
Variable 4: 9
Variable 4: 10
Variable 4: 11
Variable 4: 23
Variable 4: 18
Variable 4: 36

I think what the results say are, that little speed is burnt off initially but
then the drop is quite sharp. The mass involved is rather large by lego
standards.

I'm will try next to average the results as they come in to produce a smooth
curve.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: That doesn't totally seem right.
 
(...) If you're storing this all in the datalog, you should be able to go much farther than 27 times through the loop. Try storing a couple hundred values (how big is the datalog?) Then, you should see the time-between-changes get bigger. Also, it (...) (20 years ago, 1-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)

9 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR