Subject:
|
Re: Ultrasonic sensors - comparison & performance?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:11:00 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Dan Novy <dan@flashfilmworks.com*saynotospam*>
|
Reply-To:
|
DAN@avoidspamFLASHFILMWORKS.COM
|
Viewed:
|
1257 times
|
| |
|
|
Has anyone pulled the ultrasonics from a Nintendo Powerglove yet? I
saw someone using bend sensors wit the RCX, but haven't seen anything on
the ultrasonics. The glove comes with two transmitters and three
receivers and was originally used to determine translation and
rotation. Hmm..now I'm wondering how hard it would be to interface to
the RCX. Uh, oh, another weekend gone, just like that...
--
Dan Novy
Technical Supervisor
Flash Film Works
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Ultrasonic sensors - comparison & performance?
|
| "Dan Novy" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:4059D824.802060...rks.com... (...) now that i would really be interested in, i have a power glove that i donate to the cause, i never got aroud to making it work with the parallel port. (...) (21 years ago, 19-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Ultrasonic sensors - comparison & performance?
|
| (...) Most of my results from the HiTechnic sensor were the opposite of this. I find it to be very useful, so I use it all the time. The readings seem to show a good, linear output based on the distance. (even though I usually use it as a binary (...) (21 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
