| | sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| Up for discussion. So, while discussing "the next big project," my ten year old and I tried to come up with a complete list of all the possible "signals" available at any one time that could be incorporated into a robot, whether practical, or (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| Depends on the Area... Near a Big City there would be Bunches FM AM Radio... Satellite. TV... Mircowave...UHF SHF LF HF Cell Phones Coredless Phones CB... POLICE/FIRE... Pagers... .. Food for Thought.. Randall Lee Crabtree www.hardlug.org "Dan Novy" (...) (22 years ago, 3-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| Well, I'm guessing your ideas run the gamut of all the standard RF human-generated signals. It might be fun to track satellites, even if you can't decode their signals, I think most are just UHF. Besides standard radio transmissions, there is ULF, (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| (...) One...or maybe infinity. Most modern physicists believe that matter and energy are the same thing - and that all forces can be described by some (as yet undiscovered) "Unified Field Theory". In that sense, there is one unified field that is (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| (...) A: How many detectors do you have and what are their transfer functions? The reality is that it is the number of -observers- which matters. (...) No, they are not the same thing, they can be converted into each other according to a well (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | RE: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| (...) hmmmm... these jump to mind: Human "sensors": a) global/positional(2D) Light Level (also 3D because we move our head/eyes taking notice of the sampling vector) b) global/positional(stereo) Sound Frequency/Level (might also be considered 3D (...) (22 years ago, 4-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| (...) More than 3, which is the number of sensor inputs on a Mindstorms brick. :-) (...) I see that you adopt the modern relativist view . I agree to the extent that it depends on the number of RCX bricks present because they only have three sensor (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| (...) Beta particles are electrons, alphas are helium nuclei. Neither is electromagnetic - they are actual particles with mass, whereas photons have no or nearly no mass. Gamma rays, however, are high-energy enough to see gamma-ray photons as (...) (22 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
|
| Nick Tarleton <nickptar@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:HDCv3p.23o0@lugnet.com... (...) My bad - I always get those two confused. (...) have (...) But gamma radiation has a wavelength less than the minimum atomic radius, so they can't be (...) (22 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |