To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 20594
20593  |  20595
Subject: 
Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:43:01 GMT
Viewed: 
1048 times
  
Michael Pender wrote:

A simpler way to say this is that radiation through X-Ray frequencies is
an electromagnetic wave, while radiation above X-Ray frequencies is
particle matter (e.g. Beta particles are helium nuclei).
Beta particles are electrons, alphas are helium nuclei. Neither is
electromagnetic - they are actual particles with mass, whereas photons have
no or nearly no mass. Gamma rays, however, are high-energy enough to see
gamma-ray photons as discrete (but nearly massless!) particles. Picture it
as a short snippet of a wave.

Actually, gravity waves are detectable with the right equipment.  A simple
way to think of this is that gravity varies according to location in
space,
especially altitude.  The 'frequency' is naturally expressed in spatial
units, not temporal units.
Totally different thing. If you shake your hand really fast, you make very
low frequency gravity waves that propagate through spacetime like ripples
in a pond (I think.) They have a frequency in peaks/time, just like any
other wave. However, it is not known whether there is such a thing as a
graviton (which would be the coveted IVB here) or whether gravity is just a
bending of spacetime. Ask a superstring theorist.
--
"I love deadlines. I especially love the whooshing sound they make as
        they go by."
Nick Tarleton - nickptar@mindspring.com



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
 
Nick Tarleton <nickptar@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:HDCv3p.23o0@lugnet.com... (...) My bad - I always get those two confused. (...) have (...) But gamma radiation has a wavelength less than the minimum atomic radius, so they can't be (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: sensors, actuators, and software, oh my!
 
(...) More than 3, which is the number of sensor inputs on a Mindstorms brick. :-) (...) I see that you adopt the modern relativist view . I agree to the extent that it depends on the number of RCX bricks present because they only have three sensor (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)

9 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR