Subject:
|
Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 02:31:08 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
562 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, PeterBalch <PeterBalch@compuserve.com> writes:
> Steve =
>
>
> You're really putting me on the spot aren't you? OK ...
>
> > > mapping table in PC
> > makes it very hard to share software. =
>
>
> Before a download begins, the PC checks whether the named motors exist in=
>
> the model. If they don't, it offers you the chance to set up a new alias
> table (which is probably local to that program - you wouldn't want to mes=
> s
> up your own alias table in order to try out someone else's code). =
This is sounding a lot like the DCC system used in model train layouts.
You're looking at fitting a DCC-like controller into a programmable brick,
with each device having a programmable address?
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: RCX & RIS, a fading glory?
|
| Steve You're really putting me on the spot aren't you? OK ... (...) Before a download begins, the PC checks whether the named motors exist in the model. If they don't, it offers you the chance to set up a new alias table (which is probably local to (...) (22 years ago, 6-Feb-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
17 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
