To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18467
18466  |  18468
Subject: 
Re: Looking for correct terminology
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:49:14 GMT
Viewed: 
711 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, "T. Alexander Popiel" <popiel@wolfskeep.com> writes:
In message:  <GzqM67.B2t@lugnet.com>
            "Dean Hystad" <dhystad@mn.rr.com> writes:
Hi All,

I built a little robot that has two wheels that are tilted such that instead
of being parallel to the ground the axles stick up at an angle approximately
75 degrees to the ground.  Tilting the wheels this way raises the effective
axis of rotation and makes the robot more stable.  I have seen this done
before with cheap radio controlled toys that roll on two dish shaped wheels,
but I don't know what to call this configuration.  Any ideas??

I believe that that configuration is called 'negative camber'.  It
tends to get used on race cars a lot to improve stability through
high speed turns, if I recall correctly.


Wheelchairs, particularly those used for sports like racing and basketball,
also use negative camber.  They can get pretty extreme too.  When I worked
for a wheelchair manufacturer, we'd do camber of up to 18 degrees on each wheel.

Adrian
--
www.brickfrenzy.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Looking for correct terminology
 
(...) I believe that that configuration is called 'negative camber'. It tends to get used on race cars a lot to improve stability through high speed turns, if I recall correctly. - Alex (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)

9 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR