To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 18467
18466  |  18468
Subject: 
Re: Looking for correct terminology
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:49:14 GMT
Viewed: 
1764 times
  
In lugnet.robotics, "T. Alexander Popiel" <popiel@wolfskeep.com> writes:
> In message:  <GzqM67.B2t@lugnet.com>
>             "Dean Hystad" <dhystad@mn.rr.com> writes:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I built a little robot that has two wheels that are tilted such that instead
> > of being parallel to the ground the axles stick up at an angle approximately
> > 75 degrees to the ground.  Tilting the wheels this way raises the effective
> > axis of rotation and makes the robot more stable.  I have seen this done
> > before with cheap radio controlled toys that roll on two dish shaped wheels,
> > but I don't know what to call this configuration.  Any ideas??
> 
> I believe that that configuration is called 'negative camber'.  It
> tends to get used on race cars a lot to improve stability through
> high speed turns, if I recall correctly.


Wheelchairs, particularly those used for sports like racing and basketball,
also use negative camber.  They can get pretty extreme too.  When I worked
for a wheelchair manufacturer, we'd do camber of up to 18 degrees on each wheel.

Adrian
--
www.brickfrenzy.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Looking for correct terminology
 
(...) I believe that that configuration is called 'negative camber'. It tends to get used on race cars a lot to improve stability through high speed turns, if I recall correctly. - Alex (24 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)

9 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR