Subject:
|
Re: Looking for correct terminology
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:16:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
767 times
|
| |
|
|
If I read you right, that is the correct term, and you have a camber of
-75 degrees. Here's a short primer (on camber and caster for Ford Mustangs):
http://www.steeda.com/PR/Mustang/Alignment/alignmentbasics.htm
Dean Hystad wrote:
> I don't know if camber is the correct term to use here. If so, my robot
> wheels have 75 degrees of camber, and the wheels are cambered in instead of
> out (the wheelbase is really narrow).
>
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Looking for correct terminology
|
| (...) I see I haven't succeeded in describing the information I am looking for. I know what camber is. I work for a company that makes equipment for testing vehicle suspension kinematics, compliance, performance and durability. I spent the last (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Looking for correct terminology
|
| (...) I don't know if camber is the correct term to use here. If so, my robot wheels have 75 degrees of camber, and the wheels are cambered in instead of out (the wheelbase is really narrow). It's really a different kind of wheel design. I'm not (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
