Subject:
|
Re: flexible tubbing
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 05:22:59 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Luis Villa <liv@acpub.SPAMCAKEduke.edu>
|
Viewed:
|
1389 times
|
| |
|
|
Just out of curiosity, exactly what is the tubing for? I can't really tell.
Luis
On Tue, 15 Dec 1998, Linc Smith wrote:
> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1998 23:40:27 GMT
> From: Linc Smith <lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com>
> To: lego-robotics@crynwr.com
> Subject: flexible tubbing
>
> I am looking for a pneumatic tubing substitute that is a great deal more
> flexible than the rubber tubing supplied by Lego. If anyone has ideas, or
> experiences I would be grateful to hear about them.
>
> The application (simply) has tubing running between a support boom, and a
> processing head (gripper of sorts) that uses pneumatics. The boom and head
> are attached by a "universal-joint", and the head dangles freely. Current
> use of the tubing puts to much restriction in the mobility of the processing
> head.
>
> One idea I had was to use a coiled tube (something like a phone cord) but I
> never found anything. I need to run a total of 4 lines to the processing
> head.
>
> Thanks
>
>
#######################################################################
"One World, One Web, One Program" - Microsoft Promotional Ad
"Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer" - Adolf Hitler
#######################################################################
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | flexible tubbing
|
| I am looking for a pneumatic tubing substitute that is a great deal more flexible than the rubber tubing supplied by Lego. If anyone has ideas, or experiences I would be grateful to hear about them. The application (simply) has tubing running (...) (26 years ago, 15-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Robotics
|
|
|
|
|
|
