|
|
 | | Re: Solar-Powered Hexapod Walker
|
| Henry OneTimeCRX wrote: <snip> (...) <snip> Yup, I had the same idea a few days ago. Use two laterally symmetrical solar cells, angled outward A-frame style. Connect the solar cells to the motor on the side opposite of them and you'd have an (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.dacta)
| | | | | Re: Solar-Powered Hexapod Walker
|
| "Henry OneTimeCRX" <hchea@kungstorget.nu> wrote in message news:3AB79780.921F8D...rget.nu... (...) Yes. That is just like the real one. So it can turn within its own circle to improve manouverability It turns by turning in the wheels, then running (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.dacta)
| | | | | Re: Solar-Powered Hexapod Walker
|
| "Micah J. Mabelitini" <micahx@kih.net> wrote in message news:3AB7A891.656ABF...kih.net... (...) Well I guess that would make my model even more like the real thing. i.e. covered in solar cells regards lawrence (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic, lugnet.dacta)
| | | | | Preliminary Solar Cell Output Measurements
|
| These results are preliminary, but they'll give you some idea of the solar cell's capabilities. Outdoors - Full Overcast Voltage: 3.5V Amperage: 30mA Incandescent Lightbulb - 100W@1" Voltage: 4.1V Amperage: 150mA Indandescent Lightbulb - 100W@6" (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.dacta)
| | | | | Re: Bug in RCX 2.0 beta (Was: RIS 2.0 software now in beta)
|
| Dear fellow Lego enthusiasts, so far I did not receive any feedback to my problem report, neither from the newsgroup, nor from Lego technical support. Could somebody please try to confirm that I am not completely stupid in my analysis! Regards, (...) (24 years ago, 20-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | RE: RCX & Cybermaster (VLL comms and MicroScout)
|
| On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Marco Correia wrote: Actually, if I recall correctly, the sensor inputs are quite happy to accept voltage inputs up to 9V, in RAW mode anyway. It might not be good if they were in an "active" mode, though (rotation sensor, light (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | RE: Need for chat server?
|
| Well ? :> Have I lost this thread or did you give up on the idea? I would hang around #Robotics, #Cybermaster, #VisionCommand, #NQC, #Mecha and #Market I even would create "my own" channel: #CM-RCX-comms hmmm... ok, just a thought, eheh One problem (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | Re: Bug in RCX 2.0 beta (Was: RIS 2.0 software now in beta)
|
| (...) Hi Sebastian I think you're right in your analysis and TLG may silently have fixed the problem, because if you look at the Vision Command installation, you'll find that some of the SDK DLLs are newer in that release. For fun, I copied the DLLs (...) (24 years ago, 21-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics)
| | | | | New Site
|
| I have created a new site as a reference for educators using RoboLab in the classroom. I would love to have some of you visit the site and provide feedback. At present we have only a few examples, but we are working on adding many more. The most (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.robolab, lugnet.robotics, lugnet.edu, lugnet.robotics.edu, lugnet.robotics.events.robot-arena, lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.loc.us.in) !
| | | | | Re: Lego R/C etc
|
| (...) Your experiments are similar to one I am attempting, albeit for a different purpose. Currently, I'm leaning toward local oscillator and I.F. stage with a double balanced mixer from Mini Circuits to place me in the 144Mhz region (although (...) (24 years ago, 22-Mar-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
