Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 10:23:21 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Marco C. <(marco@)saynotospam(soporcel.pt)>
|
Viewed:
|
895 times
|
| |
|
|
At 20:56 22-01-2001 GMT, Hao-yang Wang wrote:
> In lugnet.robotics, "Marco C." <marco@soporcel.pt> writes:
> > hmmm... I'm starting to think that the best (and expensive) way to have
> > good quality wireless image is to mount the roverbot with a DV camcorder
> > (those tiny new Digital Video expensive cams) together with a X10 wireless
> > video-sender.
> I'd like know how well the image resolution this approach can deliver.
> I think the X10 video-sender converts the signal to NTSC, so this is still
> not an all-digital solution.
Yes, I wasn't talking about a perfect digital image input, only mentioned
those DV camcorders because of size and image input quality (and
auto-focus, optical zoom, steady-cam capability, etc...)
...*and* because I'll more likely spend major $$$ in a good camcorder that
I can user for regular home-video shots and at the same time use it for
lego projects because of its small dimensions.
hmmm... well, but for now, LEGO Cam will have to do, since I don't have the
$$$ for a DV camcorder neither do I have a X10 wireless PAL
sender/receiver, nor do I have a specific project that can't be made with
Lego Cam... for now.
PS: er... is there a wireless USB sender/receiver kit ? eheheh ;)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
| (...) hmmm... I'm starting to think that the best (and expensive) way to have good quality wireless image is to mount the roverbot with a DV camcorder (those tiny new Digital Video expensive cams) together with a X10 wireless video-sender. :( oh (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
