Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:00:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
653 times
|
| |
|
|
The Lego Cam's quality is much better than the X10 as I have both. The X10
was designed
for outdoor only and as such needs a lot of light otherwise the image is
dark. The Lego Cam is
the same as the quickcam. However, the wireless ability of the X10 can not
be overlooked. It
is very cool looking and makes my "Lego Planetary Rover" look real. More on
my
LPR 2001 Mars Rover later :-)
Ram
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marco C." <lego-robotics@crynwr.com>
To: <lugnet.robotics@lugnet.com>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 9:35 AM
Subject: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
> Has anyone done (or know where to look for) a review on the image quality
> of the Lego Cam ?
>
> I'm interested to know where the Lego Cam stands when compared with other
> webcams including analog-video mini-cams like the Xcam ?
>
> At least, I would like to know if the Lego Cam has better image than the
> Xcam's from X10.
>
> I own a Vision Command Lego Cam and I'm not very happy with it's image
> quality.
> I have very little experience with other webcams... I only played with a
> Creative Labs Webcam II USB for 10 minutes a year ago and I was under the
> impression that it's image quality was better than the Lego Cam's one.
>
> mc.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
| Has anyone done (or know where to look for) a review on the image quality of the Lego Cam ? I'm interested to know where the Lego Cam stands when compared with other webcams including analog-video mini-cams like the Xcam ? At least, I would like to (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
