Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 20:56:19 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
779 times
|
| |
|
|
At 15:00 22-01-2001 GMT, Ram Meenakshisundaram wrote:
> The Lego Cam's quality is much better than the X10 as I have both. The X10
This is true, in terms of both lighting and resolution.
XCam2 is a cheap, wireless camera. Whether its image quality is good enough
for you depends on the nature of your project. In my case, as long as it
picks up my barcode tags, I am happy.
In lugnet.robotics, "Marco C." <marco@soporcel.pt> writes:
> hmmm... I'm starting to think that the best (and expensive) way to have
> good quality wireless image is to mount the roverbot with a DV camcorder
> (those tiny new Digital Video expensive cams) together with a X10 wireless
> video-sender.
I'd like know how well the image resolution this approach can deliver.
I think the X10 video-sender converts the signal to NTSC, so this is still
not an all-digital solution.
Cheers,
Hao-yang Wang
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
| (...) hmmm... I'm starting to think that the best (and expensive) way to have good quality wireless image is to mount the roverbot with a DV camcorder (those tiny new Digital Video expensive cams) together with a X10 wireless video-sender. :( oh (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
