Subject:
|
LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 14:35:19 GMT
|
Original-From:
|
Marco C. <marco@soporcel.pt=spamcake=>
|
Viewed:
|
747 times
|
| |
|
|
Has anyone done (or know where to look for) a review on the image quality
of the Lego Cam ?
I'm interested to know where the Lego Cam stands when compared with other
webcams including analog-video mini-cams like the Xcam ?
At least, I would like to know if the Lego Cam has better image than the
Xcam's from X10.
I own a Vision Command Lego Cam and I'm not very happy with it's image
quality.
I have very little experience with other webcams... I only played with a
Creative Labs Webcam II USB for 10 minutes a year ago and I was under the
impression that it's image quality was better than the Lego Cam's one.
mc.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
| The Lego Cam's quality is much better than the X10 as I have both. The X10 was designed for outdoor only and as such needs a lot of light otherwise the image is dark. The Lego Cam is the same as the quickcam. However, the wireless ability of the X10 (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
| (...) hmmm... I'm starting to think that the best (and expensive) way to have good quality wireless image is to mount the roverbot with a DV camcorder (those tiny new Digital Video expensive cams) together with a X10 wireless video-sender. :( oh (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
