Subject:
|
Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 15:22:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
722 times
|
| |
|
|
That was not a general statement. The X10's quality is poor for indoor
lighting. There are several better wireless digital cameras out there
that is far better than the X10, but it costs a lot more. Cant beat the
$50 I paid for the X10 via ebay (with battery pack) for a wireless camera...
Ram
Marco C. wrote:
> At 15:00 22-01-2001 GMT, Ram Meenakshisundaram wrote:
>
> > The Lego Cam's quality is much better than the X10 as I have both. The X10
>
>
> hmmm... I'm starting to think that the best (and expensive) way to have
> good quality wireless image is to mount the roverbot with a DV camcorder
> (those tiny new Digital Video expensive cams) together with a X10 wireless
> video-sender.
>
> :(
>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LEGO Cam vs. X10's Xcam vs. other webcams
|
| (...) hmmm... I'm starting to think that the best (and expensive) way to have good quality wireless image is to mount the roverbot with a DV camcorder (those tiny new Digital Video expensive cams) together with a X10 wireless video-sender. :( oh (...) (24 years ago, 22-Jan-01, to lugnet.robotics)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
