 | | Re: NQC's future
|
|
In lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, John Hansen wrote: John, thanks for taking on the maintenance and improvement of NQC. (...) I'd definitely like to see this one implemented, when you can find the time. :-) Mark (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | NQC's future
|
|
I'm very interested in hearing from NQC users what their needs/wishes are for future enhancements. Here's my current list of updates/enhancements that I am working on. 1. Built-in and documented Spybot API. 2. Fast firmware download via USB tower (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
On "complexity", I would point out that the computational power of the neural pathways of the house fly thoroughly exceeds the computational throughput of our most massive supercomputer clusters at the moment. True "adaptation" would require (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) Just checked, yep. Not counting this one I sent three responses to -your- request for input on your project. -ALL- of them went to the list. Me thinks he protest too much. -- -- Open Forge, LLC 24/365 Onsite Support for PCs, Networks, & Game (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) Nothing, you asked a question and I explained the situation. (...) I have no interest in your mental state. (...) I've actually sent you nothing I didn't CC to the group as far as I'm aware. (...) -technical- toys. (...) You asked a question, (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Broken Mindstorms motors
|
|
We have several broken mindstorms motors. Tw got the shafts broken. Two just stopped turning. So, we decided to steal the shafts from one set to fix the other set. However, putting them back together has stopped the working but shaftless ones from (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
i'm sorry to all about using this forum to resolve private issues but i have to say one word to jim what is going on with you? if you want to get me down - do it here on the group!!! send you really smart and wise posts on the group!!! if you want (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) Use a watchdog timer instead, if you want to stop don't send any outputs. Once the timer trips the bot stops. You still get your third sensor, you'll need it for a bump switch, otherwise you won't know when to turn/back-up. Each output is (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
"Kevin L. Clague" <kevin_clague@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:Hp9qnp.Cn6@lugnet.com... (...) i know what you mean but i thought about walking through obstacles in fact walking over obstacles because we were talking about WWW and the spider from (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: an idea, can someone tell me if this is possible/been done before/etc?
|
|
(...) Ahh, yes. Not walking is an important part of the behavior :^) I'll probably have the third output control a pole reversor switch. Battery power -> pole reversor -> RC racer motor (or two?) -> pumps. I want a powerful compressor. (...) Kevin (22 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
