 | | Re: What are good LEGO robotics challenges?
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reply. Would you please explain the balance beam tug-of-war in more detail? I just can't picture it. Also, "sentience" is pretty vague. Could you expand on that, too? Thanks a lot! (22 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What are good LEGO robotics challenges?
|
|
(...) A good place to look would be several of the Lego robotic club's web pages. SMART: (2 URLs) are other groups in the US as well. (URL) is one example. I'm sure there are several others. If that's not enough for you, ITLug used to have a list (...) (22 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: What are good LEGO robotics challenges?
|
|
(...) I don't know of any lists, but here are a few more to add to yours: tug-of-war (different from sumo in that they'd have to grip a rope) (for those who are willing to risk damaging the RCX) balance-beam tug-of-war skeet-shooting (probably have (...) (22 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | What are good LEGO robotics challenges?
|
|
I'd like to know all the different LEGO robotics challenges you've seen or heard about. If anyone knows of a comprehensive list that already exists, please give me a link to it. Otherwise, I'm going to make my own list, which I would have on a (...) (22 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 2.0 circuit board changes
|
|
Phillippe, Excellent, thanks a lot. That's exactly what I needed to know and the pictures are crystal-clear. :-) So it only LOOKS really different... Thanks again, ~Mike (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: RCX 2.0 circuit board changes
|
|
(...) Hello Mike, Here is a photograph (actually a scan) of all three versions (1.0, 1.5 and 2.0) of RCX: (URL) had a look at a few RCX 2.0 printed circuit boards, and at first sight they are identical. 1.0 contained the rectifier and regulator for (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Maths functions
|
|
(...) That's nor really difficult ... nanobapt (22 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | RCX 2.0 circuit board changes
|
|
After reviewing some pictures of the RCX 2.0's circuit board today, I noticed that they are quite different. Can anybody tell me the reason why? What changed and how does it affect the RCX? I'm looking for that infamous diode that so often blows (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Maths functions
|
|
Natural log (ln), and square root. Also useful would be x^y where x and y have fractional parts. I see you have done it with just x as a float and y as an int. This would incorporate the square root by doing x^1/2 "nanobapt" <nanobapt@wanadoo.fr> (...) (22 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Maths functions
|
|
(...) What do you need more than I wrote ? nanobapt (22 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
