 | | Re: More problems with floats
|
|
(...) Eric, did you ever resolve this? If not, I could try to reproduce this... but I'd need two things: 1) the type of the return value of getVarVal 2) the type of the bool typedef Also, if you could run your cross compiler with the -v flag, that (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
|
 | | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
There is stuff going on. But it isn't my highest priority at the moment :( (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
|
 | | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) cost) (...) Replying to my own post, Why not build our own? Glue together some bricks, hollow them out and put in one of these babys: (URL) something similar. The comunity could work out building instructions and develop our own add-ons. (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
|
 | | Re: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
(...) What might be doable and best is a documented bus extension (a card plug-in) slot. This could be taken to the extreme by making a cpu unit that just has power (plug-in option of course) and memory (expandable of course) and maybe the IR or (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
|
 | | Robotics Courses
|
|
Hello Liz, First of all, please forgive me for emailing you out of the blue... I happened to see a recent email of yours, and I noticed your signature line detailing the fact that you teach Robotics courses, and it peaked my interest. My company, (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | RE: A very Power Tool
|
|
I'm glad for the disabling of attachments, forcing people to put textual links. If I want a file, I'll download it, otherwise it's "wasted bandwidth" which someone has to pay for. Which operating system and applications are more secure is like (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | software-controlled motors
|
|
Steve Baker writes: > I've used a collection of four Scouts driven by IR commands from an RCX > to drive a total of eleven motors. Just program the scouts to read simple > 1-byte messages sent from the RCX - use the top two bits to select which > (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | Re: start_process question....
|
|
(...) first off, "proicess_name" should be "process_name", but thats not your problem. You are trying to use an integer as an array in this snippet. You have "int process_priority;" and then try to treat it as an array in "process_priority[pid]=1;" (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
|
 | | Re: A very Power Tool
|
|
Robert Templeton writes: > (tired of virus attachments to e-mail) Me too. They're now banned from the lego-robotics mailing list, as are text/html-only postings, as are multipart/alternative postings. Email is text. You want HTML, go to the web. (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
 | | RE: What about this for a new RCX 2.5 setup?
|
|
I'd be happy with a good "official" LEGO SONAR sensor and a fixed version of the LEGO Rotation Sensor (without the lost "clicks" bug) On the RCX side, I'd like a RCX 3.0 with 6+ sensor inputs and more outputs (and more RAM. I'm using MANAS sets to (...) (23 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.dear-lego)
|