To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / *31864 (-20)
  BricxCC release 3.3.3.8
 
I am hesitant to announce that I've uploaded a new version of BricxCC to my website. This release comes in a full-featured install executable. As a result the download is a bit larger (i.e., 1.6MB). This release hopefully will fix the problems some (...) (23 years ago, 16-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  FW: legOS help
 
hi i'm having some problems installing legOS and hopefully someone can help i'm a bit new to unix (before the last couple weeks the most i'd ever done was check my e-mail when i was at school) since i got my mindstorms kit i've been using NQC (RCX (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Good pictures of fortcoming Spybotics
 
(...) Seems to be the same internals as this one and I think the red button is a on-off switch: (URL) reinvent the wheel) The gear seems to appear in gray also: (URL)Looks like they might be quite interesting... Personally I lend more and more to (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Dissecting the RCX
 
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Limbaugh" <rlimbaugh@ureach.com> To: <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 1:14 PM Subject: Dissecting the RCX (...) few (...) non-linearily, (...) RAM (...) as (...) monitored (...) (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Good pictures of fortcoming Spybotics
 
One thing that is interesting is how different the models look from the earlier pictures shown here: (URL) like the new 120 degree Y shaped half beams. "Huw Millington" <hmillington@cix.co.uk> wrote in message news:GrL7p2.8q9@lugnet.com... (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Dissecting the RCX
 
"Rob Limbaugh" <lego-robotics@crynwr.com> wrote in message news:200202151814.NA...ach.com... (...) few (...) non-linearily, (...) RAM (...) as (...) Actually, it doesn't really matter what order you hook up the address lines (or data lines, for that (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Good pictures of fortcoming Spybotics
 
"Huw Millington" <hmillington@cix.co.uk> wrote in message news:GrL7p2.8q9@lugnet.com... (...) If the motor can be controlled by the RCX like the manas unit, all the more interesting! One of the robots looks like it comes with a new 36(?) tooth (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Good pictures of fortcoming Spybotics
 
The pictures at (URL) the first we have seen, I believe, of the finished articles. One shot shows a good view of the IR control box with what looks like 5 buttons (L, R, Fwd, Back,. plus a trigger?) and a speed control. Looks like they might be (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Dissecting the RCX
 
After looking up some component data sheets, I've found myself wondering a few things: 1) The H8/3292 pin 42 connects to the D43256B pin 23. According to data sheets, this is A6 from the H8 and A11 on the RAM. Both data sheets show address numbering (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: BricxCC release 3.3.3.7
 
(...) This is great! I'm glad more than one user is experiencing this as that makes it more likely I'll be able to figure out the problem. Can any of you three who have reported this problem run a few tests for me? I haven't yet been able to (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: BricxCC release 3.3.3.7
 
(...) Whoops. I totally screwed that up. I apparently put an old EXE in the ZIP file. I need to seriously improve my configuration management! :-) Sorry about the mixup. I'm not going to release again until I'm sure I've tracked down and fixed the (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: How communication is handled
 
(...) (2 URLs) easier to remember :-) BTW, the RCX has a H8/3292 Keep a copy Jürgen (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: power source
 
(...) Actually, it is regulated (speaking as one who has had to replace the fuse that comes before the regulator). Think about it. It has to be. The batteries provide 9V, the MCU requires 5V. If it wasn't regulated, you'd kill it. There is also a (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Re: Lost my IR tower
 
Stef Mientki has also posted the information here: (URL) along with a wealth of other info! ___...___ Get your own "800" number (...) (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Lost my IR Tower
 
Stef (...) The IR LEDs are pulsed on and off at 30kHz - that's on top of the 2400bps serial signal. I had to remove that 30kHz signal. That's what the 100nF (on the base of the transistor) is for. The time-constant of the 100nF and the 470R has to (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Lost my IR tower
 
Hi Thorn Family I would like to see the diagram. I'm told it's at (URL) can email it directly if it's not there. Peter (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: How communication is handled
 
hi Rob, (...) here is some information about IR-tower/communication, also check Kekoa's site mentioned below (URL) (...) check the site of Kekoa (URL) (...) Stef Mientki (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  RE: How communication is handled
 
the better way to know how the IR work is the legOS kernel source. I read it and see that legOS use IRQ for transmiting and receiving message. When legOS receive a message he see first if the activity of the IR transmitter is not true. Then he call (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  How communication is handled
 
Hello everyone! Does anyonk know what the RCX does with IR data it sees from the IR module when it is busy transmitting? I've set the RCX in a situation where I know the IR it was sending could be seen by it's own IR detector, yet it didn't appear (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Lost my IR Tower
 
(...) It's probably easier to solder the wires on without the diodes. They could probably be put back on easily though. (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR