 | | Re: Does anyone accually like 4561?
|
|
snip (...) Yes. The stickers are stupid. I cut mine off so that they were not stamp'd (...) This is just reverting to a older way of doing things. I have plenty of 1*4 bricks with printed grills on them. James Powell (25 years ago, 4-Oct-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone accually like 4561?
|
|
Yeah - I like it, and my mate Chris (a non-Internet AFOL) does too. I just got my 4561 on Friday and it looks a lot better built than it does in the catalogue. I won't say it's perfect - it has it's good and bad points. The obvious bad point is the (...) (25 years ago, 3-Oct-99, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: This is a Throwbot?
|
|
Alex wrote in message ... (...) I have Jet, but no Scuba (...) I had no problem standing Jet. The joints are versatile enough to balance the center of gravity (...) At first I had trouble with this, but I have it down now. The way to properly throw (...) (25 years ago, 2-Oct-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
(...) I am not sure what the exact scale is off the top of my head but I will check my Essential Guide to Vehicles this weekend to see if I can derive anything from that. Eric Remove ".nospam" when replying be E-mail The New England LEGO Users (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
(...) I believe it is about 3 meters tall. Dunno how tall it'd be in Lego though. Jeff (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
(...) Not to beat the "not to scale" to death, but I was curious the other day, and calculated the height an AT-AT would be if that piece were used for the feet, and it was built to scale with the 'foot's width... It'd be about 20 centimeters tall. (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
(...) But it could be useful as the top of an AT-AT foot, possibly. I don't like the way TLG has aggresively started to use this piece as a unibody for small vehicles. The only bad part about set #4910. Steve (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
Maybe if they marked the 4950 (and most of the Rock Raiders) line as ages 6-8 I wouldn't have such a problem with them. But as an overall value, these sets in general are awful. They just don't have that much building value - my 8 year old likes the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
(...) I agree that it looks like an AT-AT foot but it would be terribly out of scale I think. It might work better as an AT-ST or AT-PT foot. Eric Remove ".nospam" when replying by E-mail The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
(...) Yes, it does indeed have the sloped control stand in teal. I was a bit surprised to find this part myself, I admit. And the grey odd "plate" which forms the base of the vehicle is really cute. It looks pretty much like an AT-AT feet, I think. (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Review: 8446 '(Monster) Crane Truck'
|
|
Set: 8446 'Monster Crane Truck' (EUR/ASN) 'Crane Truck' (AMR) Theme: Technic/Advanced # Pieces: 573 MSRP: US$63/SEK599 Instructions: 155 pages. Scale: Must have, very good, good, fair, poor Overall rating: good Decals: didn't count them (decals are (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
Does it have the sloped control stand in teal, or are my eyes deceiving me? (BTW I need one of those in white if someone has some, I can trade grey or black for it) Just think, a 6990 Futuron monoral with teal accents, wouldn't that look cool? (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
|
|
I just thought I would throw in by 2 cents worth on these 2 sets. First let me say that I do not personally own 4950 but my nephiew got it recently and I helped him put it together so I have first hand knowledge. Personally I think 4950 ( (URL) ) is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have the 8479 bar code truck?
|
|
(...) I haven't opened my Robotics Discovery Set yet, but from the box, it looks like it comes with 2 clutch gears. The RIS really should have come with clutch gears. (25 years ago, 29-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Pontoon Plane vs. Biwing Baron (Re: My favorite Adventurer sets)
|
|
(...) Hi, Kevin. I originally gave a response here: (URL) I'll try to give some abbreviated comments again here. I guess my main gripe with the PP is that the two sets of wings are too close together (in my opinion the upper wings should be above (...) (25 years ago, 28-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
(...) Yes, they are called Tail Draggers because it appears that they are dragging their tails, not because they actually do. Tail Draggers are harder to take off in, you have to do a series of S turns in order to actually see down the runway. And (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
(...) Yes , they did have a skid of some type. I put the term "tail draggers" in quotes because I think that was the nick name of the style of landing gear, as opposed to the tripod or "tricycle" style which has a wheel under the front nose and two (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
(...) They mostly had at least a skid under the tail. I can't think of a plane that actually dragged the back end of the fusalage and the trailing edge of the tailplane along the ground like the BB does. Those WWI and earlier planes were so lightly (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
(...) Some of the WW1 planes are "tail-draggers" On my LEGO models I add the LEGO piece thats looks like a 1x2 plate with two rods attached to either end. Lots easier on the tail : ) (...) you dont see the strings tied to the triggers? <grin> (...) (...) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone have the 8479 bar code truck?
|
|
(...) Yeah, that post was mine. And I almost posted exactly what you just said, but then I realized exactly how much the bar-code set costs. It's nice that these gears are available somewhere else, but it's not exactly an easily accessible somewhere (...) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
