To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.undergroundOpen lugnet.underground in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Underground / 28
27  |  29
Subject: 
Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews
Date: 
Fri, 1 Oct 1999 19:28:06 GMT
Viewed: 
7924 times
  
In lugnet.reviews, David Eaton writes:
> In lugnet.underground, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > > And the grey odd "plate" which forms the base of the vehicle is really
> > > cute.  It looks pretty much like an AT-AT feet, I think.
> > 
> > I agree that it looks like an AT-AT foot but it would be terribly out of
> > scale I think.  It might work better as an AT-ST or AT-PT foot.
> 
> Not to beat the "not to scale" to death, but I was curious the other day, and
> calculated the height an AT-AT would be if that piece were used for the feet,
> and it was built to scale with the 'foot's width... It'd be about 20
> centimeters tall. Pretty durn short if you ask me...
> 
> Anyway... too small. An AT-PT foot might look great, tho! Anyone know what the
> scale "should" be for an AT-PT?

I believe it is about 3 meters tall.  Dunno how tall it'd be in Lego though.

Jeff



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Cudo's to 4910 and an Ugh to 4950
 
(...) Not to beat the "not to scale" to death, but I was curious the other day, and calculated the height an AT-AT would be if that piece were used for the feet, and it was built to scale with the 'foot's width... It'd be about 20 centimeters tall. (...) (27 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.underground, lugnet.reviews)

11 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR