 | | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
Joseph Gonzalez wrote (...) I have to disagree with you here, Joseph. The only thing I like about the Biwing Baron is the "rotary" engine ( a pity lego didn't make it actually rotate, though it's the work of only a minute or two to make it do so). (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
In lugnet.adventurers, Joseph Gonzalez writes: {{SNIP}} (...) Here I have a question NOT for the still pure of faith <grin>: Have you (or anyone) attempted 'surgery' via Dremel tool (or similar) to actually make a zepp out of this blimp? I make the (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | My favorite Adventurer sets
|
|
I'm really enjoying the Adventurer's theme (though the '98 sets are considerably better than the '99 sets in my opinion). Here are the top models (again in my opinion): 5909 - Treasure Raiders Really just a minifig pack but the biplane and car are (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Insectoids - better than I thought, Rock Raiders - disappointment
|
|
I had only bought the 6909-Sonic Stinger but just picked up the 6919-Planetary Prowler (at a discount price) and I find myself liking the Insectoids sub-theme more than I thought I would. I'm seriously looking at picking up more of the sets on (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.space, lugnet.reviews, lugnet.underground)
|
| |
| | Re: Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
|
|
(...) Good review. You were right on in your assessment of the mechanicals and building of the set--it's not at all complicated mechanically, but it shows the builder a *lot* of different building techniques. Steve (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
|
|
Ka-On Lee wrote in message ... (...) 15 (...) set (...) Hmm, a chance to contribute. I will try to do a review of the 8445, I am also interested in hearing other peoples thoughts on this kit. I was both happy with and disapointed with it, I will try (...) (25 years ago, 20-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Review of 'Classic Train'?
|
|
Yup, if you mean 3225, I posted a review and it is earlier in this very group. (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Review of 'Classic Train'?
|
|
Does anyone have a review of this set? It's int he latest S@H catalog, and while I'm not really a trainhead, this one looks pretty cool. Comments? (I don't mind that it doesn't come with track or a speed regulator. I don't have the space to set it (...) (25 years ago, 19-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Review: 8286 3-in-1 car
|
|
Ok here is my first post to Lugnet. It is the first technic set I get in 15 years and it is my first review, so please forgive me for any mistakes. :) Also I tend to be harsh when rating my LEGO sets. I haven't seen a LEGO set that I would call it (...) (25 years ago, 18-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Reviews wanted for #6090 Royal Knights Castle
|
|
Jeff Johnston wrote in message <37D07585.A947B4B5@m...ne.net>... (...) Actually, the biggest raised base plate I'm aware of is the 48x48 base plate in 5808 (there is one annoying thing about this plate, it has two rounded corners, with a radius of (...) (25 years ago, 15-Sep-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
