 | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —René Hoffmeister
|
| | | (...) You really shouldn't have to apologize. I didn't meant it this way. I just thought the topic is of no interest, without any subjective assessment. But so much the better that you carry on with LENNI, I'm really glad about it. Unfortunalety, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | (...) Ha! You do better than many native-English speakers I deal with daily. (...) That's a good question. I do think most feeds will end up being served from a centralized server, but that's not an absolute necessity. RSS links can be distributed, (...) (20 years ago, 24-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | (...) Why have a centralized server? I'd expect there be a list of feeds someplace, and maybe mirroring of feeds... But it would make a lot of sense to have each feed hosted off the service that generates it. Unless LENNI wants to support remote (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I saw a centralised server as an aggregator, not the primary source of the original content. I think there's a desire to be able to aggregate feeds from many places and present them blended together. Once aggregated, some specific filtering (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | | | (...) That's pretty much what I'm thinking too... provide tools for anybody to publish LENNI-enhanced feeds from their own sources, and provide other tools for readers, either web-based or desktop/compiled. And as a side benefit, I also see the (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —René Hoffmeister
|
| | | | (...) Hm. I guess there is a misunderstanding somewhere (and I think it's caused by language barriers, sorry, I simply don't know how to translate individual technical descriptions). But I'll try one more time. It would be ridiculous if we couldn't (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: RSS vs. Atom (was: Attention All RSS Geeks) —Kelly McKiernan
|
| | | | (...) [SNIP] (...) I agree, one centralized area would be an excellent resource, one which LENNI could accomplish easily, I believe. That's a big part of why I think something like this should be created. Let me expand my assumptions on the project (...) (20 years ago, 29-Aug-04, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
