Publishing : 4345


Publishing / 4345	4344 \| 4346

Subject:	Re: Deeplinking vs waiting for moderation vs impatience (was Re: nw mosic style
Newsgroups:	lugnet.publish
Date:	Thu, 2 Oct 2003 20:53:33 GMT
Viewed:	2289 times

> It's what I said in the first place but you didn't take that input well, did > you? > > I've noted in the past that you're not too good at taking input about stuff, I'd disagree with that: http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=28324 http://news.lugnet.com/space/?n=28299 Now, I'm not going to research indefinately, but I'm sure I could find more evidence to support the contrary - that Travis can be quite good at taking input. And even in this string, it seems to me he didn't act out of line. Perhaps it is the way in which input is given that affects how that input is taken. hm? -Lenny

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Deeplinking vs waiting for moderation vs impatience (was Re: nw mosic style
(...) Ya, you're right. The WAY input is given certainly does affect how input is taken. In this case, the input "patience grasshopper", when spoken by a relative newcomer, just totally rubbed me the wrong way and off I went, and off Travis went in (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.publish)

Message is in Reply To:

		Deeplinking vs waiting for moderation vs impatience (was Re: nw mosic style
(...) "Whatever" back at you, bud. (...) How much less? Inquiring minds want to know. (...) Careful who you call grasshopper then, son. (...) Know when to provide deeplinks and know when to wait, or expect some portion of your audience not to care (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.publish)

22 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search