 | | Deeplinking vs waiting for moderation vs impatience (was Re: nw mosic style
|
|
(...) "Whatever" back at you, bud. (...) How much less? Inquiring minds want to know. (...) Careful who you call grasshopper then, son. (...) Know when to provide deeplinks and know when to wait, or expect some portion of your audience not to care (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Deeplinking vs waiting for moderation vs impatience (was Re: nw mosic style
|
|
(...) I'd disagree with that: (URL) I'm not going to research indefinately, but I'm sure I could find more evidence to support the contrary - that Travis can be quite good at taking input. And even in this string, it seems to me he didn't act out of (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Deeplinking vs waiting for moderation vs impatience (was Re: nw mosic style
|
|
(...) Ya, you're right. The WAY input is given certainly does affect how input is taken. In this case, the input "patience grasshopper", when spoken by a relative newcomer, just totally rubbed me the wrong way and off I went, and off Travis went in (...) (21 years ago, 2-Oct-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Deeplinking vs waiting for moderation vs impatience (was Re: nw mosic style
|
|
Larry, I've only been an AFOL for 7 years, and only been on LugNet for one of those. As a reader, I was rather unclear on why you felt the need to flame Mr. Kunce's string just to say he didn't post his URL properly. This being your version of (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Deeplinking vs waiting for moderation vs impatience (was Re: nw mosic style
|
|
(...) There was flaming in both directions, but your point is well taken. (I had considered this matter closed prior to your post...) There is merit in reading the entire message tree if one comes to a discussion late, in this case you may have (...) (21 years ago, 12-Oct-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
