 | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Tim Rueger
|
| | | (...) All true. It's the "careful attention to backward compatibility" that bugs me. HTML is supposed to be device independent, so you don't *need* to worry about these details. Sure, tags enable new features without breaking older browsers, but you (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) It still is, and you still don't need to unless you really want to. That's the winning beauty of it. Unfortunately, when people ignore compatibility, it's usually that they're using new features and forgetting about backward compatibility (...) (26 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Tim Rueger
|
| | | | (...) Websites that intentionally exclude the largest possible audience will lose in the marketplace. eBay, Amazon, and Yahoo seem to do just fine with plain old HTML, why shouldn't anyone else? (...) The designer had better be serious about those (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) I disagree. First, whether or not a website loses in the marketplace has little to do with whether the exclusion of the largest possible audience was intentional or unintentional, right? :) Second, for the largest possible audience, you would (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | (...) Say, what do you think about HTML/XML extensions for doing line-art? (I mean official extensions, of course -- if they can be standardized upon. There are so many people competing for this right now, it frightens me.) Anyway, it's not that (...) (26 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Alan Shutko
|
| | | | | (...) Actually, my biggest complaint these days is their latency. It takes so long to download 30 little gifs used to put together a page on a modem. And I'd _love_ to have some fast connection, but the only one available here is a T1. And those (...) (26 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) In theory, a bunch of small GIFs -should- load quickly with a page, right? As long as both the client & server are using HTTP 1.1 and Keep-Alive? I know what you mean, though... What a gunky thing to see a bunch of little image icons on a page (...) (26 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Tim Rueger
|
| | | | (...) A great idea. I know of one proposed standard, from Adobe, Netscape, and IBM - PGML (precision graphics markup language). The W3 proposal is at: (URL) back to the "old technology browsers" thing, I'm glad we've agreed to disagree. :^) However, (...) (26 years ago, 22-Apr-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | (...) We probably agree more on the basic principles than it seems. :) I agree with all the ideals -- I just don't see the ideals being fully idealized forever, what with all the sorts of bozo stuff going on like Active-X (glorified MS-OLE, which is (...) (26 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Typefaces: Verdana vs. Times —Tim Rueger
|
| | | | (...) OOOO! Tufte *rocks*. I've got two of his books (Visual Display of Quanititative Information and Visual Explanations), and they are just a total joy to read and look at. Check out Tomalak's Realm, too: (URL) got pointed to it (and JN) by Dave (...) (26 years ago, 5-May-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
