Subject:
|
Re: Shot by the Sheriff K. Loch
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 07:29:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1401 times
|
| |
|
|
Burkhard Schloemer wrote:
> I don't like the way "Moderation" on Brickshelf is being handled recently.
Neither do I, but I know that impatience isn't exactly a virtue.
> Like probably 98% of all Brickshelf users I never uploaded anything
> offending, not even unneccessarily large images. Nevertheless, ANY new image
> I try to upload now is being shot down, shackeled and dragged away for later
> interrogation, without explanation.
Since Kevin is responsible for (as well as paying for) the
Brickshelf website, there really isn't any good reason
anything should be allowed to be shown there until he has
verified that it will not give him any trouble.
If you dislike the system, you are free to set up your own
web site.
> While Kevin's intentions may be good and
> reasonable, the result is not. That's not the way things work in the real
> world, for damn good reason. Think about it.
It is very much the way things work in the real world. The
responsible editor (and sometimes also his lawyers) reads
every single article in a newspaper before it is published,
to make sure he is not breaking the law by publishing it.
Freedom of speach does not include a right to have your
stuff published on other peoples web sites.
Play well,
Jacob
--
Red Bird Mark II:
http://jacob.sparre.dk/LEGO/Transport/Fly/Red_Bird_Mark_II/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Shot by the Sheriff K. Loch
|
| I don't like the way "Moderation" on Brickshelf is being handled recently. Like probably 98% of all Brickshelf users I never uploaded anything offending, not even unneccessarily large images. Nevertheless, ANY new image I try to upload now is being (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jul-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
