Subject:
|
Re: A question: Acceptable image sizes
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Tue, 2 Feb 1999 15:20:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
668 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 12:54:00 GMT, sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk (Jacob Sparre
Andersen) wrote:
> PS: Thumbnails wouldn't make sense for whole catalog pages.
But brief synopses would. For example, I cruised a site that wanted me
to order from scanned images of a catalog. Links to each scanned page
were provided. But no mention of the page contents were provided on the
links page. So, to find what I wanted, I had to click into a large
number of pages. Also, each page reference was simply the JPEG image.
So once I was on a page, all I could do was to hit the Back button, and
click another link. That's not a big deal, but having a set of links to
the other pages would have made browsing much easier.
Steve
--
Today, I'm happy. *Really* happy.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: A question: Acceptable image sizes
|
| On Tue, 2 Feb 1999 15:20:53 GMT, Steve Bliss uttered the following profundities... (...) Was thinking no thumbnails. Synopses definitely. Many a time, too have I had lost precious time waiting forever for something to download just enough to see if (...) (26 years ago, 3-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: A question: Acceptable image sizes
|
| (...) It depends on the purpose. - For printing I want ~2000x3000 pixel images (preferably not larger than 300kb). - For on-line viewing I want ~550x300 pixel images (60kb seems reasonable for this purpose). - Thumbnails should probably not be (...) (26 years ago, 2-Feb-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
