| |
Jim Green wrote:
> I like being able to talk face to face with reps. Other than the occasional
> free lunch, it helps in explaining that, indeed, I did spec a scratch-n-sniff
> coating and, yes, the die-cut is supposed to fold into a chicken. :o) PS: you
> really don't want me to be on *any* design committee.
You mean they gave you a scratch-n-sniff chicken for lunch??
;^)
> Aw, come on Suz, here's your chance to go hexachrome with stochastic
> screening!
:-p~ [salivatory response triggered]
> Imagine the pop you would get on a green brick! I know you want to.
Nooooo! make it stop! (sobbing)
> But seriously, I think color matching would be fairly easy... an
> operator supplied with some bricks
that's true. But we might not get our LEGO back (!!)
Lord knows what crawls around those presses.. a grungy lot.
> A higher line screen, too... again, if the paper has any gloss (gotta
> take advantage of that tight dot).
good point. (no pun intended)
> Then of course I'm a prima donna and would
> think nothing of speccing billboards with Mohawk Options.
That's funny, I'm actually doing a billboard now.
> I'd like to participate in any way that I can.
I hope we'll be in touch if this gets rolling.
> > and KKK's birthday!
(Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen)
-Suz
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 2002 NELUG wall calendar
|
| Dangerously, I got to thinking again... (...) Agreed, definitely no argument. In my mind I was thinking b+1 if anything. I just wanted to acknowledge that it's a bad idea to screen a photo in full- color... you tend to lose the yellows, bright (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug, lugnet.publish)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
